Congressman Ron Paul Responds
To Media Ignorance With A Smile
Monday, January 28th, 2008

Sometimes it seems that proponents of
Ron Paul are angrier than he is at the treatment he's received in the
media; sometimes people wonder - like Jay Leno did when
Congressman Paul appeared on The Tonight Show - how Ron Paul
is taking the media purposely ignoring him as a gentleman. Why he's
not out "kicking someone's ass," as Jay put it.
The Louisiana
GOP, who waited almost a week to release the winners of the Republican Louisiana primary,
finally released their delegates'
votes: and the "official results" are just as impossible to discern
as the "unofficial" ones.
It's moments like these that any normal
person, in Paul's place, would be extremely
frustrated.
So it's hard for some people to understand when Ron
Paul maintains his kind smile, keeps his voice quiet and humble, cracks
light jokes (that often inspire thought long afterwards).
But those
of us that truly understand Paul - and there are many more of us than you
think - we smile back at him with the feeling of sharing an inside
joke. For every person that ignorantly tells us, "Ron Paul can't
win," we shake our heads and feel sorry for anyone that believes in the
word "can't."
And we take heart, when that honest, straightforward
man of smaller stature yet infinite wisdom reminds us that in fact,
the meek may be ridiculed, but they shall inherit the Earth.
Other
politicians - and the media - can take the word "hope" and they can print
it and stretch it and skew it and taint it. There is only one
candidate whom the word hope truly
embodies.
It's Ron Paul.
We see - from his actions,
not his words - his integrity, honesty, and his desire for there to
be a better America...the kind of inspiration our country was to others
long before this war started.
"When I started this campaign more
than a year ago, I was a somewhat reluctant candidate," Ron Paul posted on
his website this afternoon. "I knew our message of freedom, peace,
and prosperity was the right one for our country, but frankly, I didn't
know how many people today would have ears to hear it."
"Well, did
I learn a lesson! Millions of Americans understand what ails our
country, what is needed to fix it. So, with you at my side, I am in
this effort to win...not only by building the ideas of liberty, but by
getting the nomination. Our opponents would call that nuts - you
know, the advocates of more inflation, more spending, more taxes,
more war."
He adds, "One would never know this from the
mainstream media, but we've had only a few primaries and caucuses, and
even after the extremely important date of February 5th, we will still
have more than half to go. And the Republican nominee will not be
decided by the popular vote among the 'leading candidates' in a few states
also handpicked by the media. The nominee will be decided by the
delegates. So let me tell you a little about our 'under-the-radar'
strategy to get those delegates."
(To read the rest of this letter, click
here!)
From our own investigating,
we know that the media and his own party are purposely suppressing
Paul's message. MSNBC censored him at the Florida debate, Louisiana is covering up the results of Paul's win until after Super Tuesday, FOX
barred him from participating in the debate after his numbers beat
Giuliani's.
But none of that even matters. What matters is
this: The people see it. The people are voting. The
delegates choose. And Ron Paul is steadily infiltrating our
mailboxes, our conversations, our websites, your
interest.
The media doesn't choose the President. You
do.
It curls in our bellies, quickens our blood, resounds through
our beating hearts, again and again and again. Hope.
Hope. Hope.
A candidate that is not
tied to anything doubtful, isn't about to work with a Cheney, and had no part in this (be
that invading or funding). Hope.
Hope. Hope.
That hope is for Ron Paul. Are
you smiling?
Keep it here for the results of upcoming caucuses,
(we've already reported on those gone by, just use our search to find them). ConnieTalk.com: injecting
reality...and hope...into your mass media!
**UPDATE: To those of you who have sent us e-mails,
please note that this article was an
editorial.
| ed-i-to-ri-al |
1. an article in a
newspaper or other periodical presenting the opinion of the
publisher, editor, or editors.
2. a statement broadcast
on radio or television that presents the opinion of the owner,
manager, or the like, of the station or channel.
3.
something regarded as resembling such an article or statement, as a
lengthy, dogmatic
utterance. | When The New York Times
can endorse Hillary Clinton and John McCain, we thought it only
proper we post our endorsement. It is perfectly allowed for an
editorialist to publish their opinion - it is still related to
news.
If we're judged because our selection is Ron Paul - so be
it.
We're okay with that.
Wait! There's more! More News
>>
|