Ongoings Of The Ron Paul Movement
Monday,
March 31st, 2008

Amy's Ice Cream at the Austin, Texas Airport now offers a "Ron Paul
Combo" / Source
The Fort Worth Star Telegram
reported
yesterday that Ron Paul supporters are challenging local Republican
leaders over control of local conventions, and may have won the right to
have Paul at the state GOP convention. A similar conflict went down
in Missouri, where Ron Paul delegates were shaking things up last week. Yesterday, Ron Paul's "Texas Straight Talk"
column at House.gov was updated with a
column from Paul on Money, Inflation, and Government.
I found this
to be very well-timed, as some of the news networks actually had the
audacity this weekend to plug segments on "the dollar is down, prices are
up...we've got your scoop on how to handle it." How hilarious is
that?
Anyhow, here's Ron Paul's editorial from yesterday on our
economic situation.
These past few weeks have provided an unfortunate
opportunity to discuss inflation. The dollar index has reached new
all-time lows. The total money supply, M3, as calculated by private
sources, is growing at a disturbing 17% rate. The Fed is pumping
dollars into the economy at an alarming rate. Just recently the Fed
announced new loan auctions totaling $100 billion. That is new money
created from thin air. If these money auctions, combined with the
bailout of Bear Stearns, continue to be the trend, we are in for some
economic stormy weather. The explanation lies in understanding the
basics of money, and why it is dangerous to give government and big banks
control over it.
First, money is not
wealth, in and of itself. You cannot create more wealth simply by
creating more money. Wall Street bankers cry out for more liquidity,
but what is really needed is more value behind the dollar. But the
value, unfortunately, isn't there.
You see, the Fed creates
new money and uses it to purchase securities from banks. Flush with
funds, these banks seek to put this money to use. During the Fed's
expansionary period, much of this money went to home loans. Through
a combination of federal government inducements to lend to risky
borrowers, and the Fed's supply of easy money, the housing bubble took
shape. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were encouraged to purchase and
securitize mortgages, while investors, buoyed by implicit government
backing, rushed to provide funding. Money that could have been
invested in more productive, less risky sectors of the economy was thereby
malinvested in subprime mortgage loans.
The implicit guarantee
from the Fed is quickly becoming explicit, as those institutions deemed
"too big to fail" are bailed out at taxpayer expense. Wall Street
made a killing during the housing bubble, reaping record profits.
Now that the bubble has burst, these same firms are trying to dump their
losses on the taxpayers. This approach requires more money creation,
and therefore debasement of all dollars in circulation.
The Federal Reserve, a
quasi-government entity, should not be creating money or determining
interest rates, as this causes malinvestment and excessive debt to
accumulate. Centrally planned, government manipulated economies
always fail eventually. The collapse of communism and
the failure of socialism should have made this apparent. Even the
most educated, well-intentioned central planners cannot plan the market
better than the market itself. Those that understand economics best,
understand this reality.
In free markets, both
success and failure are options. If government interventions prevent
businesses, like Bear Stearns, from failing, then it is not truly a free
market. As painful as it might be for Wall Street, banks, even big
ones, must be allowed to fail.
The end game for this
policy of monetary inflation is that the money in your bank account loses
purchasing power. So, by keeping failing banks afloat, the Fed
punishes those who have lived frugally and saved. The power to
create money is a power that should never be granted to government.
As we can plainly see today, the Fed has abused this power, and taxpayers
are paying the price.
Source