|
|
Help, The Mainstream Media Swallowed Ron Paul!
Monday,
February 11th, 2008

Yes, you read that correctly: the mainstream
media has swallowed presidential candidate Ron Paul. He's still in
the presidential race, so everyone needs to calm down...but if you
judged by the news headlines from the mass media, that is definitely not
the impression you would get. When he's mentioned at all - which
is rarely, compared to all of his competitors - the titles
range from "With Losses Mounting, Paul Downsizes Campaign," to "Ron Paul
Has Left The Building."
Luckily, they didn't fool us then; and
they certainly don't fool us now.
First of all, here are
some solid post-Super Tuesday facts:
- Ron Paul is projected as the 2nd place winner in Alaska (98% reporting),
5% behind Huckabee and 1% ahead of John McCain UPDATE: 2/17/08 With less than 200 votes left to report, Ron Paul came in 2nd place to Mike Huckabee
(Huckabee has 6 delegates there; Paul, 5)
- Ron Paul is 1st place in Montana, whose results are 100% in (Romney would have
beat him at 38% but has dropped out of the race) at 25%, with John
McCain at 22% and Mike Huckabee at 15%
- Ron Paul is currently tied for 1st place with John McCain at 13% in Nevada
(with 39 precincts left to report). UPDATE: 2/17/08 Ron Paul is winning Nevada.
- Ron Paul is 2nd place in North Dakota whose results are 100% in (Romney had 36%),
with John McCain first at 23% and Mike Huckabee last at 20%
- It is still unclear whether Ron
Paul won in Louisiana, and what
the final results are for Maine
McCain is at 21% and Paul at 18% (Huckabee just 6%), but >4% of
precincts haven't reported yet, which could put Paul over the top).
- Ron Paul's Congressional
home state Texas has not held their primaries yet; nor has the key
state of Ohio; nor has the state he is from, Pennsylvania (PA's are
not until April 2008)
- There are 22 more states or US
territories left to go.
 Former President &
friend Ronald Reagan campaigned for Paul for
Congress
Well, gee, but none of that is in the MSM, is it? They've
showed clear bias towards the Democratic party this year, and to the liberally conservative John McCain. Sure, the
media favored Romney for a while as well, but he was just a casualty in
the overall scheme. It's been stated repeatedly that Paul and
Huckabee were "not serious contenders" from the very beginning, if that
makes any sense. If all of this seems a little bit
confusing, you must have missed our article on Congressman Ron Paul
yesterday. Let's catch you up.
Who
would stand to profit if candidates offering corporate
tax reductions got elected?
Who would stand to lose
if companies were forced to minimize cheap-labor overseas
manufacturing, namely in China, which Huckabee and Paul both strongly
address?
Whom are the companies sponsoring that are doing the
censoring?
Who would lose if the Federal Reserve was made to stop
us from printing and spending what we don't have; if the IRS was
eliminated, even?
Who does not want you to hear a word of what
Ron Paul has to say?
Who?
|

RSS Feed
Put our monkey
head on your Google Toolbar to keep updated!
|