Public Supports Demjanjuk Staying In US
Wednesday, April 15th, 2009 by Connie T.
 John Demjanjuk hearing his death sentence in Jerusalem court
21 years ago. The ruling was later overturned.
Too often, people surprise us with their capacity for cruelty. But let
it not be said that sympathy - and kindness - are not a part of the American spirit. In
Ohio, at least, those polled have consistently disagreed that
John Demjanjuk, the accused Nazi death camp guard, should be deported from Cleveland, Ohio to
face court proceedings in Germany. To the tune of about 67%. This astonished us.
Demjanjuk has a German arrest warrant accusing him of
being an accessory to about 29,000 deaths at Sobibor camp in Poland during World War II.
After
being removed from his home this week in a wheelchair by immigration officials, federal immigration
released Demjanjuk from custody; a US Court of Appeals in Cincinnati granted him a stay, at least
while his deportation case is being reviewed.
Demjanjuk is not a strapping young criminal. He is
a feeble, wheelchair-bound, 89-year old man who rarely ventures from his suburban home due to, his attorney said,
Demjanjuk's
suffering from severe spine, hip and leg pain from bone marrow disorder, spinal deterioration, a kidney tumor and kidney stones,
arthritis, and gout.
The thousands of deaths suffered in
the atrocities at Nazi death camps in WWII are hopefully not too far removed by the years from
our hearts and our regrets at history's misdeeds. Assuming we are properly irate at the severity of
the cited crimes...Americans have a sense of justice. Sometimes we seek justice
through a court of law, and sometimes justice is born.
John Demjanjuk denies participation in the
crimes of which he is accused. If he ends up being deported, his family says that he will endure immeasurable
pain, only to survive several
more months in a German hospital and never live to stand trial.
Is this a fate worthy of an elderly
US citizen (which Demjanjuk is), presumed innocent until proven guilty? Perhaps not. And were he indeed guilty of the crime(s),
perhaps in the public's eye his own condition - his proximity to the afterlife, and any potential demons whose
wrath no court can deliver - is justice enough.
|