CNN story on Hillary Clinton
is laughable 
Wednesday, October 10th,
2007
Many thanks to CrooksandLiars
for posting
this clip!
Let the smearing begin.
This is not even news - which makes you wonder why I'm writing about it
- but CNN considers it news, so I just have to comment on that.
The "news" is that Sandy Berger may be giving Hillary Clinton advice in
her campaign as a presidential candidate. Berger pled guilty to
removing documents from the National Archives building in 2005, stuffing
docs from the 9/11 archives into his pants. The whole reason for
this story is that Berger has been a friend of the Clinton family for
decades. Which has to do with - what? Have any of your
friends done anything you've disagreed with, ever?
"Sandy Berger is a longtime friend but he
has no official role in the campaign. Like many people he offers
advice, but he has no official role in the campaign," Phil Singer, a
Clinton Campaign Spokesman told CNN. Then CNN has to follow it up
with, "what that unofficial role is remains unclear." Reaching
much? I'm not saying I like or dislike Hillary, but can't you
imagine that if you were in her shoes, you'd have thousands of people
offering unsolicited advice? Everyone thinks they know what
works. Of course he has probably offered his two cents, if they've
had contact recently. So what? Who cares? Does that
mean she'll be stuffing her bra with confidential information?
No!
Then they have some toupee'd-up guy from
the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, Larry Sabato, saying,
"The real risk for Democrats with Hillary Clinton has always been, not
so much her personality, as her past. And her past is inextricably
tied to her husband's administration, and all of the problems
experienced in the 1990's." Say what? What problems?
Her attempt to fix the health care system? The fact that we were
actually friends with countries abroad, instead of being sneered
at? "All of the problems experienced in the 1990's?" Well my
God, I am suing her for the bangs I was sporting.
More News
>> |
