Part
II, Google Trends Contradict Media
Polls On Ron Paul
Saturday, February 2nd, 2008 (Continued from
PART I)
Now, let us reveal the Google Trends
results on each of the Presidential candidates' names being searched, in
the U.S. only (sorry, just voters here!), over the past 30 days.
This is strictly search volume: the amount of news articles posted
graph we've cut out (you'll have to wait for another story on that
one). As explained in Part I, these are automatically generated graphs by
Google on Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and
Republican candidates Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul.

So, here's what we're going to
do. We pieced together all of trend histories, and then traced a
clean line over each in a different color for each candidate.
We left it so that you could see the line underneath a little bit, so you
know we did not change it:

Now, how about we re-enlarge it,
and place all of them on top of each other, making some of them
semi-opaque so that you can see where they all stand:

What does that look like to you? Because it looks to us as
though, on average, the interest by search volume - by readers -
places the candidates in this order:
1. Mitt
Romney
2. Ron Paul
3. Barack Obama
4. Hillary
Clinton
5. John McCain
6. Mike Huckabee
If you've noticed how
presidential candidates Congressman Ron Paul and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee are being
treated in the media, you might get the impression that they are
not even contenders.
If you read about their low numbers reported in the
mainstream media in certain states (while states they scored highly
in aren't mentioned), you might get the impression that they
are not even contenders.
If you saw how little speaking
time they were given in the Florida and California debates
, you miiiiiiight just get
the impression that they are not even contenders.
You would be so wrong.
At least for one of them.