About Us 

 

Don't forget where you
got the best news!

Add us to your favorites!
 







Barack Obama Responds To Plagiarism Accusations With Contradictions
 Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama sparked controversy with a February 16th Wisconsin speech, where he used lines from Gov. Deval Patrick's "Just Words" speech almost word for word (pun intended).  The similarities - which hit the internet long before Hillary Clinton's campaign latched onto it, contrary to popular belief - were dismissed by Patrick's camp, now, as well.

Gov. Patrick is taking the stance that he basically asked Obama to use his words - just not in so many words.  AH, the puns are endless.  The Raw Story's got the transcript on Patrick's Diane Sawyer interview, in which the Massachusetts Governor says, "I've known Barack for almost 15 years now.  We talked a good deal during my own campaign and his.  We fully expected - I fully expected he would sus...sustain a charge at some point trying to belittle his ability to motivate people with language."

Oh, so it's just language, and it's just being used as a motivator.  Hell, let's just decide not to hold anybody accountable for anything they say at all, then.

As one of our readers so astutely commented yesterday:  "If you pass off your friend's essay as yours, it is still cheating even if your friend freely gave it to you."  Which Patrick didn't - not specifically.

Barack admitted he used the words from Deval's 2006 speech, saying they often borrow from each other, making sure to add "I know Senator Clinton on occasion has used words of mine as well."

The two speeches were broadcast side-by-side on video on the net, though, so its not like he could deny it.

Hillary Clinton campaign spokeswoman KiKi McClean said, "The focus of the speech is how important words are; then you find out the words weren't his.  That's the irony of the whole issue here."

HA!

So Barack is now on our home turf in Ohio, speaking to Youngstown State University yesterday, and moved onto topics that made us skeptical beyond mere who-said-what's:  Obama talked of funding children's educations, raising minimum wage every year, how he wants to address the mortgage and foreclosure problems plaguing America.

"I want to make sure we are dealing with the home foreclosure crisis," he said yesterday.  "People being lured into mortgages they couldn't afford - we're going to set up a $10 billion fund to make sure the people who are paying their mortgages can stay in their homes."

A $10 billion fund?  Gee, that's a lot of money.  Yes, Barack has a fancy "Obama Keeping America's Promise" PDF booklet you can download from his website, yet nowhere in that plan - which  reiterates in various places that "Barack Obama will provide $10 billion in additional Mortgage Revenue Bonds" to assist those who cannot afford their mortgage payments - nowhere does it mention where this mysterious $10 billion is going to come from.

Money must exist to be offered.  Money must be printed to exist.

Nor does this assist any of those who have already lost their homes:  it's being called a foreclosure crisis because so people have already been foreclosed upon.  And if the money only goes to those that have been paying their mortgage, than those who couldn't make every payment on time could be left out.  And those who have been renting vs. buying to avoid losing their homes in rough economic times would still be SOL, and kicking themselves to boot (we're full of puns today).

Our government is over $9 trillion in debt.  Regardless of whether or not Barack would make good on his word to funnel less jobs overseas, we will continue to leak hundreds of millions of dollars per day overseas as long as we're still at war with Iraq.  The war is where all of our economic hardships are stemming from, and we should be addressing the root, not the veneers.




click here to learn more

American employers - especially those that do not contract out jobs and manufacturing to China - sure as shit can't afford an increase in minimum wage every year while the war is going on, which is what Obama proposes.  No more than our government can afford to offer those corporate tax cuts when our soldiers need uniforms, equipment, ammo, Humvees.  Therefore this vicious cycle of debt and the decrease in value of the dollar will continue, until we start getting our troops out of the Middle East - and not at the rate of a couple of combat troops per month, with troops to take up permanent residence there, as our lead Democratic candidates allude to.

Engaging in battles of words and speeches and prose - both Clinton and Obama - is getting us nowhere, faster and faster.  Both of them voted in favor of this war.  Go look it up:  here's her voting record, and here's his:  use "Edit -> Find" in your top toolbar (or hit CTRL+F) and search for the word Iraq on both of those pages.  Keep hitting "find next," and you'll find all of the answers you need.

Conveniently, Obama was not present to vote on many of the bills as 2008 election season neared; but they both have long voting records that you should know about if you're voting.

The "War of the Words" means nothing to us in the first place - the importance lies in their actions, not their words.

There's only one candidate left in the race who has staunchly opposed the Iraq invasion since before the war even began.  Who has said time and time again, we need to withdraw now - not just tiny piece by tiny piece - and begin a true policy of non-intervention (not just the word).  Stop policing the world, and attempting to democratize a world that doesn't want us as a big, bullying, older brother - the same thing the Bush administration is trying to do to with Serbia and Kosovo right now.

It's definitely not John McCain, nor Mike Huckabee, who have both voiced the possibility of the U.S. occupying Iraq for years and years to come.

It is Libertarian-turned-Republican Ron Paul.  He is also the only one warning us about printing and spending, and whose voting record matches what comes out of his mouth; and who is fading off into the media sunset as you sit there Googling Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

No to the war, Yes to requiring full reports and disclosure on what's going on there, No to funding it, No to funding it, No to funding it, No to funding it...

Take the time to learn about him, and what he stands for - what the corporate media refuses to report on - before it's too late.  64% of Americans oppose the Iraq War.  First learn.  Then vote.

Comments > >  



 
 
  RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Put our monkey head on your Google Toolbar to keep updated!



 


Wait!  There's more!
More News >>

All content & images owned by ConnieTalk.com unless otherwise accredited

Proud blogger member of:

 Politics blogs  Top Blogs Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites My Zimbiofeeds2read  News and Media Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory  
  +Favorite me on Technorati